I don’t usually follow much pop star news (ok, I do, but just in the doctor’s waiting room) but the Bieber baby thing has an interesting twist.
If he was a victim per the law, why would he have to pay child support?
Is that like sentencing someone to house arrest for assault and making the victim pay the rent?
The baby’s mother (for the love of Pete – when will the trashy term “baby mama” go away?) presents her case with the risk of charges for statutory rape of Bieber because he was under age when they supposedly had sex. (ARGHHH. The visual! Make it stop!)
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment